anu ang nauna ITLOG O MANOK?

Dapat may paliwanag kung bakit itlog o manok ang napili nyo...

Bigay ko tamang sagot pagmay tumama sainyo..

Kung walang tumama at umabot sa 100 reply ang tread nato ilalabas ko ang tamang sagot at paliwanag..hehehe isip isip mga ka PZONE.

ang sagot ko ay manok, dahil nilalang ng Diyos ang mga hayop, kabilang na ang manok dun.. hindi naman sinabi sa Bible na "Let there be eggs!".. hehehe.. iyan po ang aking kasagutan..

What Came First, the Chicken
or the Egg? by John D. Morris, Ph.D. This age-old question really
has a simple answer. Attempts
to answer it, however, and
attempts to get around
implications of the simple
answer are often quite convoluted. According to the Creator of
chickens, and the author of
the Record of their origins,
chickens came first. It was on
the Fifth Day of Creation
Week that He created "every winged fowl after [their]
kind" (Genesis 1:21) complete with the DNA to reproduce
that kind. Then He "blessed
them, saying, Be fruitful, and
multiply" (v.22) using that
DNA. For the chickens this
meant lay chicken eggs. Problem solved. Chickens are amazingly
complex creatures, with their
hollow bones, intricate
feathers, four-chambered
heart, continuous air intake,
high metabolism, complex brain, good hearing, superb
color vision, etc. Modern
domestic chickens aren't very
good flyers, having been bred
to stay home, but neither
were the recently wild forefathers of chickens from
which they were bred.
Everything about a chicken
suggests careful design. Even a chicken's egg is well
designed. The embryo nestles
safely inside, surrounded and
cushioned by amniotic fluid
and nourished by the yolk.
Metabolic wastes are insulated from the rest, while
oxygen and carbon dioxide
are exchanged across the
hard but porous shell. A healthy female chicken
produces just such a system
nearly once a day, and can
even preserve male sperm
inside her body to continue
fertilizing eggs for several days after mating. The
creationist can clearly see the
Creator's hand in each
feature, phase, and function
of both chicken and egg. The evolutionist has a
different story to tell,
however. To them, chickens
evolved from other kinds of
birds, although which ones
remains unclear. It wasn't flightless birds which gave
rise to chickens, because they
are thought to have
descended from birds which
could fly but lost that ability
through mutation. Actually, the origin of all types of birds
which live today are
shrouded in mystery leading
bird expert, Alan Feduccia, to
proclaim, "The origin of birds is
still up in the air." It's fashionable today to claim
that birds evolved from
dinosaurs, although again,
there is little agreement on
which dinosaur lineage was
ancestral to birds. The claim persists in spite of the fact that
birds and dinosaurs differ
markedly. Legs must become
wings and scales must
become feathers. Dinosaurs
had solid bones, yet bird bones are hollow. Reptilian
dinosaurs were likely cold
blooded while birds are warm
blooded with an extremely
high metabolism. Dinosaurs
had lungs similar to mammals, while the bird's breathing
scheme is totally different. At
least dinosaur eggs were
similar to birds eggs internally.
Externally, they had a soft,
leathery shell quite different from bird's eggs. All of these changes are
thought to have been
accomplished by acquiring
new genetic information
through random mutation. Did
the mutations occur in the adult progenitor of chickens
or in its eggs? There is no
evidence of either. A more interesting question
arises. Which came first—the
commitment to naturalistic
evolution and the necessity
that animals arose from
different animals, or the data to support it? Hehe yan sagot ko bro.

grabe sagot ni bro talagang may referrence na gamit sa akin itlog.

hahaha... Narinig ko na naman yang expression mong GRABE bro win.. Hahaha kumpleto detalye nga yang sagot ko eh. Hehe

nabigla lang kasi ako sa sagot mo bro paul oo nga pala ang napili ko itlog kasi ito in my own knowledge based on human life di ba wala po tayo dito sa mundo kung wala parehas ang combination ng itlog ng nanay at tatay natin.

haha... Oo nga bro win korak ka jan..

grabe paliwanag ng lahat pero wala pang tumatama sa paliwanag...sino kaya makakatapat sa talino ko.hehehe

itlog kasi yun yung unang sinabi mo sa tanong. Hehe

mali padin sir...sabihin kuna b?

hahaha mali padin ako sir.. Hehe wag na muna hayaan mo nalang muna dumami ang magpost dito. sir.

kung sabagay maganda pagmarami na hehehe konti nalang 89reply nalang lalabas na sagot.

haha di ako babase sa paglalang ng diyos, ibabase ko sa diksyonaryo.. Para sakin nauna ang ITLOG hehe.. Alam naman nating mas mauuna ang letrang I kesa sa letrang M Hahaha (may maisagot lang)

abang ako ng sagot dito.. mali pala ang sagot ko.. ano kayang logic ng sagot ni sir? naaexcite ako.. hehe..

wala parin tumatama...hehehe

Wala pa rin pala nakahula,exciting ha?

wala parin weh...sna nga may makakuwa na.hehehe

haha hayaan mo nalang muna dumugin ng sagot to bro.. Para may dadaanan pa mga kapatid natin.

awts, share na sir ng sagot.

base sa post ni ts ay nauna ang itlog bago ang manok

according to the bible eh manok...kasi giwana ng diyos ang lahat ng nabubuhay na,bgo pa mag-asawa o magsilang o mangitlog ang mga ito...at nung magbaha pumili si noe ng mga hayop kasama don ang manok so bago magkaroon ng itlog,manok ang mauna,note:sabi ni noe,humayo kayo at magpakarami,,dahil jan manok nauna,,

tama walang itlog if walang manok

sabi ko naman sainyo jejeje

manok ang nauna hahaha...

manok nga talaga jejeje